Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

...

Code Block
int a = 0;
int x = 0; // 1
finish {
  async IN(a) OUT(x) {
    // compute something
    x = someValue; // 2
  }
  // here 'x' has an undetermined value could
  // be either the value x from 1 or x from 2
}
// here 'x' contains the value computed in the async

Referencing Internal HC Values Without ROSE Generated HC Code

It's possible with certain function/macro calls to reference the HC worker state even though you aren't in a valid HC program. I ran into this in some HCMPI code compiled with hcc when trying to call

 

Code Block
HCMPI_Comm_rank
HCMPI_Comm_size

which reference the fields comm_rank and comm_size in the HC worker state. However, I got segfaults because no HC worker state existed as hcc had not generated any of the necessary code using ROSE. I solved this by adding a dummy finish scope in the program, indicating to the compiler that this was indeed HC code. hcc then correctly produced the auto-generated code for initializing the HC state.

Calling HC Functions From non-HC Code

When calling an HC function from non-HC code in separate files, the hcc compiler will not be able to resolve the function definition. This is a result of the name-mangling that HC does, which is not reflected in the original header files. As a result, when the final ROSE generated C file is compiled with the original calling C/C++, the compiler won't resolve the originally named function to the new HC-mangled one. The way to fix this is by adding

Code Block
#pragma hc continuable

above the function declaration in the header file. And tada! Fixed. Credit to Vincent for teaching me this.