Homework 2

Due: 11:59pm, Wednesday, Sept 18, 2024

100 points

For all Racket assignments in this course, set the DrRacket Language to Advanced Student (under How to Design Programs). Your assignment will be graded using the specified language level. If you use a different language level, your code may not work when it is graded.

For all Racket assignments in this course, set the DrRacket Language to Intermediate Student with lambda (under How to Design Programs). Your assignment will be graded using the specified language level. If you use a different language level, your code may not work when it is graded.

Do the following programming problems using only the primitives mentioned in Lectures 2-5.  Do not use the functions in the Racket library if they are not mentioned in Lectures 2-5.

  1. [30 pts] Section 14.2 in the HTDP First Edition book describes what it calls Binary Search Trees.  The terminology in this section of the book is non-standard because a Binary Search Tree contains both keys and values in each node and hence represents a finite mapping from keys to values.   The stub file contains a simple Racket programming problem (with a solution consisting of only a few lines of executable Racket code) based on essentially the same inductive data definition as Binary Search Trees but the type of the value field is parametric (alpha) which must be instantiated to symbol to match the explication of Binary Search Trees in the book. Using the stub code for Problem 1 in HW02.rkt as a starter template, your task is to 
    • Give some examples of the (BSTM-of symbol) type.
    • Devise a set of test cases (input-output pairs expressed using check-expect) for the getBSTM function.
    • Write a Template Instantiation for getBSTM (based on the general template for functions that process (BSTM-of symbol).
    • Develop the code for the function getBSTM that satisfies the contract given in the stub file.
    • Briefly compare the asymptotic worst-case running time of searching a (BSTM-of symbol) that is well balanced (maximum depth is proportional to the log N where N is the number of keys in the (BSTM-of symbol)) and function searches an ordered (list-of (pair-of key value)), where each pair is represented as a two-element list (as in Problem 2 below).

    Each of these five subtasks takes only a few lines except for devising the collection of test cases.  A good set of test cases might take as many as 10 lines.

  2. [30 pts] The stub file HW02.rkt provides a detailed description of how to develop the function cross (and supporting function cross-help) that consumes a (list-of number) and a (list-of symbol) and produces a (pair-of number symbol) where a (pair-of number symbol) is represented by a two-element list containing a number and a symbol.

  3. [30 pts] The stub file HW02.rkt provides a detailed description of how to develop the function merge (and supporting function merge-help) that consumes two ascending (technically non-descending} (list-of number) inputs merges them to form an ascending (list-of number).

  4. [10pts]  The ubiquitous Fibonacci function defined by the trivial fib program given in the stub tile HW02.rkt is interminably slow (exponential running time) for large inputs.  Develop a Racket function fastFib that consumes a natural number n, produces the same answer as the fib function defined in the stub file, and runs in linear time (assuming that the primitive addition operation runs in constant time, which fails for very large n).  Hint: write a help function fastFibHelp that accumulates the result in an accumulator argument performing essentially the same computation as an imperative program relying on a loop that maintains fib(k-1) and fib(k-2) in mutable variables as k increases from 2 to n.  The poor efficiency of the trivial functional program for fib is due to the fact that it repeatedly computes the Fibonacci function for small k exponentially many times.

    1. Show Type Contracts, Purpose Statements, Examples, and Template Instantiations for fastFibHelp and fastFib.  (The answers for the Template Instantiations can vary; only the salient features (primarily recursive calls) matter.)
    2. As usual, testing comes for free given that you provided input-output examples.  Make sure that after you run your program that no source code text (definitions of fastFib and fastFibHelp) is shaded in the DrRacket definitions panel.  Such shading indicates a failure to evaluate the shaded expressions in any test case.

Optional problem for extra credit: [50 pts (a challenging problem)]
The Fibonacci function fib is defined in the stub for Problem 4 in HW02.rkt. The naive program for computing fib coded in the file HW02.rkt runs in exponential time, i.e. the running time ofh  (fib n) is proportional to C*bn for some proportionality constant C and base b > 1.  It is easy to write a program that computes (fib n) in time proportional to n as assigned in Problem 4.  Your challenge is to write a program that computes (fib n) in log n time assuming that all multiplications and additions take constant time (which is unrealistic for large n). More precisely, your program should compute (fib n) using only O(log n) addition and multiplication operations (less than C*log n operations for some constant C).

Hints

  •  Derive a recurrence for fib(2*m) in terms of fib(m) and fib(m-1). Derive a similar recurrence for fib(2*m+1).    To produce an algorithm that runs in log operations you need to reduce computing the pair (fib(2*m),fib(2*m-1)) to computing (fib(m),fib(m-1)) using a bounded number of arithmetic operations and tests. 

  • Initially write a program that works when n is a power of 2.  Then refine this prototype to a program that works for all n based on determining whether n is even or odd.  

  • This is a challenging problem.  Make sure that you have thoroughly completed the regular homework problems before attempting it.

  • In my solution, I used "dotted pairs" to reduce overhead.  The "dotted pair" representation of a pair (a,b) is (cons a b) which is illegal in all of the HTDP dialects when b is not a list,  It is supported in the "other language" called "Pretty Big".  This design choice is a bit of a stunt to minimize obvious overhead.  Of course, you can define pairs using (define-struct pair (left right)) without compromising the goal of a solution that only requires O(log n) operations.  My intuition was that such pairs have more overhead than dotted pairs but I did not perform any benchmark comparisons.  Please put your solution to the challenge problem in a separate file called Chal02.rkt and submit as instructed in the Canvas announcement (11:59 pm on Monday, Sept 23). 
  • No labels